|
< previous
| next >
The Economics of Substation Maintenance
Because power dissipation in a substation is not nearly
as great as that across a transmission/distribution line,
the economics of leakage current suppression is not explored.
However, Si-COAT offers tremendous benefits in the reduction
of maintenance in substations.
Coastal environments are notoriously difficult in terms
of substation maintenance and reliability. However modern
industrial environments can have even greater degrading effects
on maintenance expenditures.
In coastal environments, salt laden air and fog have a devastating
effect on insulators and other electrical equipment. The resulting
conductive medium that they form on insulator surfaces lead
to heavy losses in the form of leakage current. If the condition
goes undetected it can worsen until a flashover occurs. In
most cases the station is taken off line resulting in a blackout
with significant equipment damage and economic losses for
the utility and its customers.
Traditionally, the insulators on coastal substations are
regularly washed with high pressure water to remove the salt
deposits before they build up to the danger point. This is
an expensive procedure and seldom completely eliminates the
problem. Albeit rather outdated technology, another common
practice for the suppression of leakage current is greasing
of insulators, typically with silicone grease. Again, this
is a labor intensive and costly exercise that is a short term
solution at best. Insulators that have been greased need to
be cleaned and re-greased frequently.
In industrial environments much the same conditions exist.
Although the contaminants are different and may take longer
to build up, they are usually much more adherent to unprotected
insulators. It is not uncommon to have to resort to mild abrasive
blasting to remove them in order to maintain system reliability.
In virtually all cases, regular washing of insulators can
be eliminated or dramatically reduced when Si-COAT RTV Silicone
High Voltage Insulator Coating is employed. In cases where
greasing is employed, that practice is totally eliminated
with the use of Si-COAT.
Consider a typical coastal station where water washing was
used to keep the station operating. This client owned a coastal
230kV Switchyard at a 2000 MW thermal generating station on
the Western coast of the United States. The station housed
72 insulators that had to be washed every month.
A local maintenance contractor charged USD 5,010 to wash
the station. This took three days, during which the station
had to be de-energized. Neglecting the cost of the station
downtime, the annual cost to wash the insulators amounted
to USD 60,120 and the station still experienced frequent,
unplanned power outages! Clearly, washing alone wasn't doing
the job and a long term, reliable solution had to be found.
Si-COAT was chosen not because it was clearly the most economic
solution, but because its use resulted in substantial long
term operational savings.
The costs associated with coating the insulators with Si-COAT
570 were:
ItemCost (USD)Water washing (surface preparation) of Insulators
to be Coated5,010Material Costs18,720Labor to Apply the Coating6,600Total
Cost of Coating 72 Insulators30,330
Considering that each water washing was costing the utility
$60,120, the net savings of $29,760 by using Si-COAT represents
a payback period of approximately 6 months justifying the
project.
However, even after coating the insulators, the utility
prudently decided to wash the insulators once a year as a
precautionary measure. Consequently, over the 10 year warranty
period, the utility was expecting to save, additionally:
Savings (USD)First Year29,760Annual ($60,120 - $5010 over
the remainder warranty period)55,110Total over the 10 Year
Warranty Period525,750
For more details on either of the studies above, please
contact CSL Silicones Inc.
|