The Economics of Si-COAT Elastomeric Anti-Corrosion Coating

about | science | job profiles| faq | economics

Si-COAT Anti-Corrosion Coatings present the user with dramatic savings in cost based on a number of key features.

Firstly, the fact alone that abrasive blasting is unnecessary with Si-COAT vastly reduces project costs. Shortened timelines, the elimination of abrasive media use & disposal and the reduction in equipment, rigging and Health & Safety requirements are just a few of the associated cost savings.

Secondly, Si-COAT is a primerless, one-coat system, which further reduces time and money spent on the job. In most instances, Si-COAT can be installed at nearly half the cost of a conventional IOZ/epoxy/PU three-coat system.

Lastly, and not to be overlooked is the extended service life that Si-COAT offers. It is most prudent to evaluate the cost of coating a structure on an annualized life cycle cost accounting basis. With its extended life expectancy, Si-COAT drives down life cycle costs to nearly one-fifth that of conventional three-coat systems.

The table below offers a synopsis of the cost savings that can be realized with Si-COAT.

The cost comparison presented here is based on an actual case of two identical tanks coated under similar conditions such as surface condition prior to coating, access and terrain.

† Service life estimates based on moderate conditions (i.e. general industrial with no heavy fumes or fallout, rate of steel corrosion = 76 microns [3 mils] per year). Reference: NACE Paper #335

This study is presented only as a guide to evaluate relative costs. Actual project costs may vary, and in some cases may be lower.

Corrosion Economics Download PDF

 

Corrosion Economics Download PDF

Si-COAT 579 Material Safety Data Sheet

Si-COAT 579 Technical Data Sheet

Si-COAT Newsletters:
  SE 2008
  Q4 2007
  Q3 2007
  Q2 2007
  more...

 
  top  ∧
 
 

© Copyright 2004, CSL Silicones Inc.
All trademarks resistered. All rights reserved.